~ chicken-core (chicken-5) /DEPRECATED
Trap1Deprecated functions and variables2==================================345.3.15- read/source-info from the internal, undocumented module6 (chicken compiler support) is deprecated. Instead, use7 read-with-source-info from (chicken syntax).8- "set-signal-handler!" and "signal-handler" have been deprecated9 in favor of "make-signal-handler" and "ignore-signal" which are10 better suited in a multithreaded environment.11- "chicken-home" is deprecated as it is not possible to override12 when installing eggs into a custom location. Use "include-path" instead13 (or "##sys#include-pathnames" for code that is intended to be14 backwards compatible) when accessing the data location.15165.2.117- current-milliseconds and its C implementations C_milliseconds and18 C_a_i_current_milliseconds have been deprecated in favor of19 current-process_milliseconds, C_current_process_milliseconds and20 C_a_i_current_process_milliseconds21- C_pair() is now officially deprecated in favor of C_a_pair(), which22 should also be faster.23245.1.12526- ##sys#check-exact and its C implementations C_i_check_exact and27 C_i_check_exact_2 have been deprecated (see also #1631).28- "C_u_i_zerop" has been turned into an inline operation and is29 deprecated in favor of "C_u_i_zerop2".30- The define-record-printer macro has been deprecated in favour of31 record-printer and set-record-printer! procedures, and a SRFI-1732 setter for the former.3334355.0.03637- "bit->boolean" has been introduced temporarily to avoid users38 having to figure out why "bit-set?" uses a different argument39 order than the procedure with the same name that is specified in40 SRFI-33 and SRFI-60. This procedure will be replaced by the proper41 "bit-set?" in one of the next versions, together with a C level42 macro or function.4344 See also: 45489c1b3d9fb20bacc91fa393ce7330dd61d22f4546 "bit->boolean" expands into "C_u_i_bit_to_bool", "C_i_bit_to_bool"47 or "C_i_fixnum_bit_to_bool", which are all deprecated as well,48 but might be re-used in a future version of "bit-set?".